Building comparison
head to head
100 Asian CatsvsErica
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
100 Asian Cats
Optimization · Light / Casual
A relaxed visual search for a hundred hidden cats across hand-drawn scenes.
Erica
Variance · Light / Casual
A live-action FMV thriller steered through touchpad choices and gestures.
100 Asian Cats leans Optimization (Light / Casual); Erica leans Variance (Light / Casual).
100 Asian CatsErica
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 0
100 Asian Cats leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
100 Asian Cats
Clicking spotted cats demands no dexterity
Erica
Touch gestures with no skill ceiling
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
100 Asian Cats
Solo hidden-object game with no opponent
Erica
No opponent
Variance2 vs 3
Erica leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
100 Asian Cats
Cat hiding spots are unknown until found, fixed thereafter
Erica
Branch outcomes hidden on first viewing
Optimization3 vs 3
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
100 Asian Cats
Systematic screen-scanning is the only solvable layer
Erica
Mapping choice branches across replays
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.