head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Light / Casual
A relaxed visual search for a hundred hidden cats across hand-drawn scenes.

Optimization · Light / Casual
A classic point-and-click adventure where solving inventory puzzles is the entire challenge.
100 Asian Cats leans Optimization (Light / Casual); Grim Fandango Remastered leans Optimization (Light / Casual).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
100 Asian Cats
Clicking spotted cats demands no dexterity
Grim Fandango Remastered
no physical skill ceiling, point-and-click
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
100 Asian Cats
Solo hidden-object game with no opponent
Grim Fandango Remastered
no opponents, puzzle-driven
100 Asian Cats leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
100 Asian Cats
Cat hiding spots are unknown until found, fixed thereafter
Grim Fandango Remastered
no meaningful randomness
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
100 Asian Cats
Systematic screen-scanning is the only solvable layer
Grim Fandango Remastered
item and dialogue puzzle logic solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.