head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
A visual novel thriller mixing escape-room puzzles with branching life-or-death story routes.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A near-future detective thriller where solving dream-logic puzzles under action budgets branches the investigation.
999: Nine Hours, Nine Persons, Nine Doors leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos); AI: The Somnium Files leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
AI: The Somnium Files leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
999: Nine Hours, Nine Persons, Nine Doors
Tapping through text and puzzles, zero dexterity
AI: The Somnium Files
Somnium object interactions have minor timing windows
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
999: Nine Hours, Nine Persons, Nine Doors
Characters follow a fixed script, never adapt
AI: The Somnium Files
Dream-world logic is scripted; no adaptive opponent
999: Nine Hours, Nine Persons, Nine Doors leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
999: Nine Hours, Nine Persons, Nine Doors
Hidden story branches and twists drive first playthroughs
AI: The Somnium Files
Hidden time-locked Somnium actions obscure optimal routing
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
999: Nine Hours, Nine Persons, Nine Doors
Escape-room puzzles and route flowchart are fully solvable
AI: The Somnium Files
Mapping every Somnium action budget to unlock all routes is the core puzzle
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.