head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Survival horror detective story braiding two protagonists across realities.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
The reboot that turned Assassin's Creed into a loot-driven action RPG.
Alan Wake 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Assassin's Creed Origins leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Alan Wake 2
Flashlight-and-shoot timing matters under pressure.
Assassin's Creed Origins
Hitbox-based combat needs timing but lenient.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Alan Wake 2
Taken enemies follow scripted patterns.
Assassin's Creed Origins
Guard AI scripted, predictable.
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Alan Wake 2
Resource drops and mind-place clues vary.
Assassin's Creed Origins
Loot rarity rolls present.
Assassin's Creed Origins leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Alan Wake 2
Sparse upgrades; mostly narrative gating.
Assassin's Creed Origins
Gear, abilities, target loadouts solvable.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.