head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Survival horror detective story braiding two protagonists across realities.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A gritty crime shooter following two doomed mercenaries through botched heists.
Alan Wake 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Kane & Lynch: Dead Men leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Kane & Lynch: Dead Men leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Alan Wake 2
Flashlight-and-shoot timing matters under pressure.
Kane & Lynch: Dead Men
Cover shooting accuracy under pressure
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Alan Wake 2
Taken enemies follow scripted patterns.
Kane & Lynch: Dead Men
Fragile Alliance betrayals add faint human guessing
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Alan Wake 2
Resource drops and mind-place clues vary.
Kane & Lynch: Dead Men
Set-piece encounters vary little
Alan Wake 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Alan Wake 2
Sparse upgrades; mostly narrative gating.
Kane & Lynch: Dead Men
Squad orders and encounter knowledge
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.