head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
The pioneering large-scale WWII shooter built on combined-arms map chaos.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A military shooter testing aim with moderate prediction of human opponents online.
Battlefield 1942 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Medal of Honor: Warfighter leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 1942
Aim, vehicle handling, and leading shots matter.
Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Gunfights reward aim in both campaign and multiplayer
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 1942
Human teams adapt flanks and vehicle pushes.
Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Human opponents in multiplayer demand positional prediction
Battlefield 1942 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 1942
64-player chaos and spawns add noise.
Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Spawns and engagements add modest unpredictability
Battlefield 1942 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 1942
Map control and vehicle timing learnable.
Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Class loadouts and map knowledge form a thin layer
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.