head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Large-scale modern combined-arms shooter built on destructible maps and squad teamwork.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Arena duels mixing twitch dodge-punish play with RPG build preparation.
Battlefield 3 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Dissidia Final Fantasy leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 3
Gunplay, suppression management, and vehicle piloting
Dissidia Final Fantasy
Aerial dashes, dodge timing and punishes demand fast hands
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 3
Human teams adapt routes and armor pushes
Dissidia Final Fantasy
Human duels hinge on baiting bravery attacks and dodges
Battlefield 3 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 3
Spawns, destruction, and vehicle drops shuffle engagements
Dissidia Final Fantasy
Some equipment and summon randomness, mostly known state
Dissidia Final Fantasy leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 3
Unlock paths, class synergy, and map control
Dissidia Final Fantasy
Builds, accessories and matchup knowledge shape every duel
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.