head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Combined-arms multiplayer shooter famous for map-altering levolution moments and 64-player conquest.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A football sim testing play execution and play-calling prediction against opponents.
Battlefield 4 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Madden Football 64 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Battlefield 4 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 4
Gunplay, vehicle mastery, and movement under fire
Madden Football 64
Throw and run timing decides plays in real time
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 4
Human teams adapt to flanks and levolution chokes
Madden Football 64
Human opponents disguise plays, demanding prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 4
Map-altering events and spawns inject noise
Madden Football 64
Catch and fumble outcomes carry simulated randomness
Madden Football 64 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 4
Loadout tuning and objective rotation knowledge
Madden Football 64
Playbook, audibles and roster tactics run deep
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.