head to head
Battlefield 4 asks more than Worms Reloaded, and the gap is execution.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Combined-arms multiplayer shooter famous for map-altering levolution moments and 64-player conquest.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Artillery aim and turn planning against humans under wind and crate randomness.
Battlefield 4 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Worms Reloaded leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Battlefield 4 leans clearly harder on execution.
Battlefield 4
Gunplay, vehicle mastery, and movement under fire
Worms Reloaded
Grenade arcs and ninja-rope shots demand fine aim control
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 4
Human teams adapt to flanks and levolution chokes
Worms Reloaded
Anticipating human opponents' target priorities shifts each turn
Worms Reloaded leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 4
Map-altering events and spawns inject noise
Worms Reloaded
Random terrain, crates and wind perturb every shot
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 4
Loadout tuning and objective rotation knowledge
Worms Reloaded
Weapon economy and positioning theory reward planning
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.