head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Combined-arms multiplayer shooter famous for map-altering levolution moments and 64-player conquest.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Simulation-styled WWE entry praised for its showcase mode and refined reversal-based combat.
Battlefield 4 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); WWE 2K19 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Battlefield 4 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 4
Gunplay, vehicle mastery, and movement under fire
WWE 2K19
Reversal timing windows and combo execution
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 4
Human teams adapt to flanks and levolution chokes
WWE 2K19
Human versus matches hinge on counter prediction
Battlefield 4 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 4
Map-altering events and spawns inject noise
WWE 2K19
Slight randomness in pin kick-outs and AI
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 4
Loadout tuning and objective rotation knowledge
WWE 2K19
Payback systems, move-set knowledge and MyPlayer builds
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.