head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Large-scale shooter execution amid chaos, predicting human squads across evolving battlefields.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Class-based team shooter with deep mind games.
Battlefield 6 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Team Fortress 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Battlefield 6 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 6
Gunskill, movement and vehicle handling lead at every level
Team Fortress 2
Projectile aim and rocket jumps reward hands
Team Fortress 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Battlefield 6
64-plus humans adapt positioning and pushes constantly
Team Fortress 2
Spy/sniper duels are pure prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 6
Destruction, spawns and chaotic battles inject randomness
Team Fortress 2
Random crits and spread inject RNG
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Battlefield 6
Loadouts, squad roles and objective timing sit underneath
Team Fortress 2
Class loadouts and map routes solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.