head to head
Neither is harder. They score identically on all four axes, so the difference between them is in kind, not degree.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
God game blending city building, creature training and conquering by awe or force.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A fixed-camera horror puzzle game solved by methodical dual-world navigation and item sequencing.
Black & White 2 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); The Medium leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Black & White 2
Gesture casting and creature handling need mild dexterity.
The Medium
Third-person movement and simple stealth; very low twitch demand
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Black & White 2
Creature learning is trainable, not adversarially adaptive.
The Medium
No adaptive opponents; Maw is a scripted threat
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Black & White 2
Creature behaviour quirks add some unpredictability.
The Medium
Some item locations hidden on first run
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Black & White 2
City impressiveness versus army economy is the solvable choice.
The Medium
Dual-world puzzle solutions are deterministic and fully learnable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.