head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Sequel sharpening the penitent metroidvania formula with three distinct weapons.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
The stylish-action benchmark where mastering styles, weapons, and Vergil's blade is the whole point.
Blasphemous 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Devil May Cry 3: Dante's Awakening leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Devil May Cry 3: Dante's Awakening leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Blasphemous 2
Multi-weapon combat timing and platforming challenges
Devil May Cry 3: Dante's Awakening
Style-switch combos and Royal Guard timing are an execution Everest
Blasphemous 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Blasphemous 2
Scripted boss movesets, never adaptive
Devil May Cry 3: Dante's Awakening
Vergil is a hard script, not an adapting mind
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Blasphemous 2
Fixed world with hidden secrets
Devil May Cry 3: Dante's Awakening
Fixed tower; knowledge carries between runs
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Blasphemous 2
Weapon choice, altarpiece builds, and routing
Devil May Cry 3: Dante's Awakening
Style choice, weapon loadouts, and boss patterns reward labbing
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.