head to head
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive asks more than Bloody Roar 2, and the gap is execution.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A fast versus fighter testing combo execution and prediction of human opponents around beast transformations.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.
Bloody Roar 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on execution.
Bloody Roar 2
Fast combos and beast-mode cancels demand clean hands
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Bloody Roar 2
Human opponents must be conditioned and predicted to win
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on variance.
Bloody Roar 2
Full information fighter with no hidden state
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Bloody Roar 2
Beast meter management and matchup study reward homework
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.