head to head
Borderlands 2 asks more than The Banner Saga 3, and the gap is execution.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
Loot-shooter RPG built on gear chasing.

Optimization · Systems & Chaos
The series' optimization and attrition logic at its most compressed, with narrative stakes highest.
Borderlands 2 leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos); The Banner Saga 3 leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos).
Borderlands 2 leans clearly harder on execution.
Borderlands 2
Aim matters but generous hit feel
The Banner Saga 3
No new real-time mechanics introduced in the finale
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Borderlands 2
Enemies are scripted loot fodder
The Banner Saga 3
Enemy AI remains scripted; Dredge patterns are fixed
Borderlands 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Borderlands 2
Procedurally generated weapon drops vary
The Banner Saga 3
Corruption mechanic and dwindling resources push variance pressure higher
Borderlands 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Borderlands 2
Skill trees and gear math heavily solved
The Banner Saga 3
Final roster management under corruption constraints is the optimization peak
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.