head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
The original loot-driven co-op shooter set on the bandit world of Pandora.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
First-person horror thriller built on brutal improvised-weapon melee.
Borderlands leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Condemned: Criminal Origins leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Borderlands
Standard FPS aim; numbers matter more than precision
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Visceral melee blocking and counter timing
Condemned: Criminal Origins leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Borderlands
Bandits and skags are scripted
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Enemies ambush but follow simple scripts
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Borderlands
Procedural loot drops gate your power
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Unpredictable ambushes on a first playthrough
Borderlands leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Borderlands
Builds, gear math, and farming routes dominate
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Weapon choice and level knowledge converge
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.