head to head

Broken Sword: The Smoking Mirror cover artvsKen Follett's The Pillars of the Earth cover art

Broken Sword: The Smoking MirrorvsKen Follett's The Pillars of the Earth

Broken Sword: The Smoking Mirror leans Optimization (Light / Casual); Ken Follett's The Pillars of the Earth leans Optimization (Light / Casual).

EXECUTION1 /10READS0 /10VARIANCE1 /10OPTIMIZATION3 /10
Broken Sword: The Smoking MirrorKen Follett's The Pillars of the Earth

Axis by axis

Execution1 vs 1

Even - both lean on execution about the same.

Reads0 vs 0

Even - both lean on reads about the same.

Variance1 vs 2

Ken Follett's The Pillars of the Earth leans harder on variance: Choice outcomes are unknown on a first playthrough

Optimization3 vs 3

Even - both lean on optimization about the same.

Two games can score the same on an axis and still test it in very different ways - read each rationale, not just the number.

full breakdown

Broken Sword: The Smoking Mirror

full breakdown

Ken Follett's The Pillars of the Earth