head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
An aerial-view crash puzzler about maximizing chain pileups at busy intersections.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Open-world action game where procedurally generated orc captains remember your encounters.
Burnout Crash! leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Burnout Crash!
Triggering and aiming the pileup needs some timing
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Counter-timing combat and stealth execution
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Burnout Crash!
No adaptive opponent at the intersection
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Nemesis orcs remember you but remain mappable scripts
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Burnout Crash!
Traffic spawns and chain reactions add chaos
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Procedural captains with hidden strengths and weaknesses
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Burnout Crash!
Maximizing chain pileups and intersection knowledge drives scores
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
Intel gathering and exploiting known weaknesses solves fights
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.