head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A near-future Call of Duty with squad-focused multiplayer and the Extinction mode.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Accessible large-scale shooting with light prediction against human players.
Call of Duty: Ghosts leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Star Wars Battlefront leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Call of Duty: Ghosts leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Ghosts
Fast time-to-kill rewards first-shot aim
Star Wars Battlefront
Aimbot dominates blaster fights despite generous hitboxes
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Ghosts
Outguessing human routes and peeks matters
Star Wars Battlefront
Human lobbies add modest positional prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Ghosts
Spawns and lobby matchups add noise
Star Wars Battlefront
Power-up pickups and spawn flow inject chaos
Call of Duty: Ghosts leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Ghosts
Loadout and map knowledge are solvable layers
Star Wars Battlefront
Objective timing and pickup control reward learned routes
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.