head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Blockbuster 2009 sequel famous for killstreak chains and frantic multiplayer.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Fast aim duels plus predicting human movement on memorised maps.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Fast time-to-kill rewards raw aim and reflex
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered
Snap aim and reaction time dominate every gunfight
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Outguessing human rotations and flanks
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered
Online opponents rotate and adapt; pre-aiming them is prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Spawn flips and killstreak randomness
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered
Spawns and random lobbies inject per-match noise
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Killstreak economy, loadout and map knowledge
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered
Map control, loadouts and timing form a learnable meta
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 →
full breakdown
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered →