Building comparison
head to head
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2vsFIFA 16
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Execution · Competitive PvP
Blockbuster 2009 sequel famous for killstreak chains and frantic multiplayer.
FIFA 16
Execution · Competitive PvP
Mechanical football control plus predicting how a human opponent attacks.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); FIFA 16 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2FIFA 16
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 7
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Fast time-to-kill rewards raw aim and reflex
FIFA 16
Dribbling, defending and finishing inputs decide duels
Reads6 vs 6
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Outguessing human rotations and flanks
FIFA 16
Human opponents online adapt tactics match to match
Variance3 vs 3
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Spawn flips and killstreak randomness
FIFA 16
Deflections and finishing randomness swing close games
Optimization5 vs 4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Killstreak economy, loadout and map knowledge
FIFA 16
Formations and squad construction reward study
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.