head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Blockbuster 2009 sequel famous for killstreak chains and frantic multiplayer.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Stick-skill basketball execution layered with predicting a human opponent's play-calling.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); NBA 2K10 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Fast time-to-kill rewards raw aim and reflex
NBA 2K10
Shot timing, dribble moves and defense need real stick skill
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Outguessing human rotations and flanks
NBA 2K10
Human opponents' play-calling and tendencies must be predicted
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Spawn flips and killstreak randomness
NBA 2K10
Shot RNG and bounces add modest game-to-game noise
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Killstreak economy, loadout and map knowledge
NBA 2K10
Roster knowledge, play-calling and matchup exploitation reward study
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.