Building comparison
head to head
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2vsPuck
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Execution · Competitive PvP
Blockbuster 2009 sequel famous for killstreak chains and frantic multiplayer.
Puck
Execution · Competitive PvP
A physics-driven multiplayer hockey game testing precise control and reading opponents.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Puck leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2Puck
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 8
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Fast time-to-kill rewards raw aim and reflex
Puck
Precise stick angle and body control decide every play
Reads6 vs 6
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Outguessing human rotations and flanks
Puck
Multiplayer rewards selling fakes and predicting human positioning
Variance3 vs 3
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Spawn flips and killstreak randomness
Puck
Puck physics add bounces but reward control over luck
Optimization5 vs 4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Killstreak economy, loadout and map knowledge
Puck
Positioning and angle discipline form a learnable layer
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.