head to head
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 asks more than Star Wars: Hunters, and the gap is execution.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Blockbuster 2009 sequel famous for killstreak chains and frantic multiplayer.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Hero-shooter aim and team prediction over objective-based arenas.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Star Wars: Hunters leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans clearly harder on execution.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Fast time-to-kill rewards raw aim and reflex
Star Wars: Hunters
Aim and ability timing decide 4v4 skirmishes
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Outguessing human rotations and flanks
Star Wars: Hunters
Human squads rotate and bait around objectives adaptively
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Spawn flips and killstreak randomness
Star Wars: Hunters
Hero matchup luck matters more than any RNG
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
Killstreak economy, loadout and map knowledge
Star Wars: Hunters
Hero counters, comps and objective timing reward study
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.