head to head
Call of Duty: Warzone asks more than Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, and the gap is variance.

Execution · Grand Arena
Battle royale built on COD's tight gunplay.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.
Call of Duty: Warzone leans Execution (Grand Arena); Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Call of Duty: Warzone
Long-range gunfights reward perfect aim
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Warzone
Rotations and third-party reads decide fights
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
Call of Duty: Warzone leans clearly harder on variance.
Call of Duty: Warzone
Drops, loot, circles inject real RNG
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
Call of Duty: Warzone leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Call of Duty: Warzone
Meta loadouts and rotations heavily solved
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.