head to head
Candy Crush Jelly SagavsMicrosoft Minesweeper
Candy Crush Jelly Saga leans Variance (Systems & Chaos); Microsoft Minesweeper leans Optimization (Systems & Chaos).
Candy Crush Jelly SagaMicrosoft Minesweeper
Axis by axis
Execution1 vs 2
Microsoft Minesweeper leans harder on execution: Click speed only matters for leaderboard times
Reads1 vs 0
Candy Crush Jelly Saga leans harder on reads: Solo with no opponent to predict
Variance6 vs 6
Even - both lean on variance about the same.
Optimization6 vs 7
Microsoft Minesweeper leans harder on optimization: Constraint deduction from number clues is fully solvable logic
Two games can score the same on an axis and still test it in very different ways - read each rationale, not just the number.