head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A dexterity-focused card-cheating game where executing sleight-of-hand maneuvers under time pressure is the primary test.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Open-world Stone Age action game about hunting and conquering tribal outposts with tamed beasts.
Card Shark leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Far Cry Primal leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Card Shark leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Card Shark
Cheating gestures require precise timing and sleight-of-hand inputs
Far Cry Primal
Bow aim, melee timing, beast control under pressure
Card Shark leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Card Shark
NPC marks follow scripted reactions; not truly adaptive
Far Cry Primal
Scripted tribal AI never models the player
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Card Shark
Card distribution contains some hidden info but is secondary
Far Cry Primal
Wildlife encounters and patrol spawns are random
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Card Shark
Learning optimal cheat sequences and tells is a solvable puzzle
Far Cry Primal
Outpost routes, crafting economy, beast taming order
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.