head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A brawler that tests combo execution and crowd management across linear gauntlets, with a light optimisation layer from its RPG progression.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Co-op-focused action sequel hurling Titus against Tyranid swarms with parry-heavy melee combat.
Castle Crashers leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Castle Crashers
Combo execution and crowd-control timing are the performance ceiling
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Parry, dodge and gun-strike timing against swarms
Castle Crashers leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Castle Crashers
PvP arenas add light human-opponent reads
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
PvP Eternal War adds some human prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Castle Crashers
Enemy spawns follow scripted patterns with minimal randomness
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Tyranid swarm spawns vary run to run
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Castle Crashers
Levelling investment, magic loadout, and pet choice are optimisable
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Class builds and perk loadouts reward planning
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.