Building comparison
head to head
ClustertruckvsSuper Mario World
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
Clustertruck
Execution · Pure Mechanics
First-person physics platformer about leaping across a convoy of crashing trucks.
Super Mario World
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Precise jump execution across fixed levels with secrets to memorise.
Clustertruck leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Super Mario World leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
ClustertruckSuper Mario World
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 7
Clustertruck leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Clustertruck
Frame-tight jumps across moving trucks
Super Mario World
Perfect inputs trivialise every jump, spin and cape flight
Reads0 vs 0
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Clustertruck
No opponent
Super Mario World
Scripted Koopas adapt to nothing
Variance2 vs 1
Clustertruck leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Clustertruck
Physics chaos makes truck piles unpredictable
Super Mario World
Levels are fixed; nothing hidden survives one playthrough
Optimization5 vs 4
Clustertruck leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Clustertruck
Route lines and ability use for speedruns
Super Mario World
Secret exits and route knowledge add a modest solvable layer
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.