head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A tower-defense-style strategy game defending against alien comet invasions.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A psychological horror experience where puzzle knowledge and avoidance routing matter more than combat skill.
Comet Crash 2: The Kronkoid Wars leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Silent Hill 2 (2001) leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Silent Hill 2 (2001) leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Comet Crash 2: The Kronkoid Wars
minimal direct control, mostly tactical placement
Silent Hill 2 (2001)
Clunky combat is intentional; survival over precision
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Comet Crash 2: The Kronkoid Wars
limited AI opponent adaptation
Silent Hill 2 (2001)
Monsters follow simple fixed behaviours, never model the player
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Comet Crash 2: The Kronkoid Wars
randomized comet and enemy spawns
Silent Hill 2 (2001)
Some item placements are unknown first time; fixed thereafter
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Comet Crash 2: The Kronkoid Wars
tower/unit placement strategy optimization
Silent Hill 2 (2001)
Puzzle solutions, route knowledge and weapon use are fully learnable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.