Building comparison
head to head
CommandovsDOOM (2016)
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.
Commando
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Pure arcade twitch survival against memorisable enemy wave patterns.
DOOM (2016)
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Push-forward arena FPS where movement and aim are the whole game.
Commando leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); DOOM (2016) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
CommandoDOOM (2016)
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 8
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Commando
Dodging bullet streams while shooting is pure twitch
DOOM (2016)
Aim, movement, glory-kill timing all peak.
Reads0 vs 1
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Commando
Soldiers spawn in fixed scripted patterns
DOOM (2016)
Demons scripted attack patterns.
Variance2 vs 1
Commando leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Commando
Minor spawn timing noise across runs
DOOM (2016)
Minimal encounter randomness.
Optimization4 vs 5
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Commando
Grenade conservation and pattern memorisation aid survival
DOOM (2016)
Rune and weapon mod picks meaningful.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.