head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Deeper sequel turning occupied-Europe missions into intricate solvable stealth puzzles.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A Viking survival game where preparing properly trivialises each biome boss.
Commandos 2: Men of Courage leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Valheim leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Commandos 2: Men of Courage
Multi-commando coordination under timing windows
Valheim
Block-and-parry timing matters in boss fights.
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Commandos 2: Men of Courage
Scripted patrols with no adaptation
Valheim
Enemies follow scripted AI; no adaptation.
Valheim leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Commandos 2: Men of Courage
Vision cones shown; layouts fixed
Valheim
World seed and biome layout introduce mild randomness.
Commandos 2: Men of Courage leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Commandos 2: Men of Courage
Open-ended missions still reduce to solved routes
Valheim
Gear progression and base infrastructure define progress.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.