head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Real-time tactics where every mission is a clockwork stealth puzzle to be solved.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
More giant clockwork sandboxes where mapping NPC schedules is the real skill.
Commandos 3: Destination Berlin leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Hitman 2 (2018) leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Commandos 3: Destination Berlin leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Commandos 3: Destination Berlin
Tight click timing chaining distractions and kills
Hitman 2 (2018)
Minimal dexterity needed with a solid plan
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Commandos 3: Destination Berlin
Guards follow fixed patrol scripts, never adapt
Hitman 2 (2018)
Clockwork NPC loops, nothing adapts
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Commandos 3: Destination Berlin
Unknown patrols only until scouted, then fully mapped
Hitman 2 (2018)
Mission stories hidden until explored
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Commandos 3: Destination Berlin
Each mission reduces to a solvable sequence puzzle
Hitman 2 (2018)
Routing, disguises, and unlocks converge on solved runs
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.