head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
First-person horror thriller built on brutal improvised-weapon melee.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Open-world Stone Age action game about hunting and conquering tribal outposts with tamed beasts.
Condemned: Criminal Origins leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Far Cry Primal leans Execution (Practiced Mastery).
Far Cry Primal leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Visceral melee blocking and counter timing
Far Cry Primal
Bow aim, melee timing, beast control under pressure
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Enemies ambush but follow simple scripts
Far Cry Primal
Scripted tribal AI never models the player
Condemned: Criminal Origins leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Unpredictable ambushes on a first playthrough
Far Cry Primal
Wildlife encounters and patrol spawns are random
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Condemned: Criminal Origins
Weapon choice and level knowledge converge
Far Cry Primal
Outpost routes, crafting economy, beast taming order
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.