head to head
Neither is harder. They score identically on all four axes, so the difference between them is in kind, not degree.

Execution · Competitive PvP
A round-based tactical shooter decided by aim duels and adapting to humans.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.
Counter-Strike 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike 2
Aim, spray control, and movement are the headline skills.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike 2
Five humans constantly adapting peeks, fakes, and timings.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike 2
Spray RNG and unknown opponent positions add fog.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike 2
Economy, util usage, and map theory are studyable.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.