head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Online football where stick control meets reading opponents.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP); EA Sports FC 24 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
EA Sports FC 24
Precise stick skills, timing, dribbling under pressure
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
EA Sports FC 24
Online play vs adapting humans rewards prediction
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
EA Sports FC 24
Minor RNG in deflections and momentum swings
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
EA Sports FC 24
Squad building, tactics, Ultimate Team economy
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.