head to head
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive asks more than FIFA Soccer 2005, and the gap is execution.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Classic licensed football testing input control and opponent pattern reading.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP); FIFA Soccer 2005 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on execution.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
FIFA Soccer 2005
Off-the-ball control and finishing timing are mechanical skill
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on reads.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
FIFA Soccer 2005
Human opponents adjust attack patterns across a match
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
FIFA Soccer 2005
Bounces and keeper behaviour add minor chaos
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
FIFA Soccer 2005
Formations and exploit plays of the era are learnable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.