head to head
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive asks more than Pro Evolution Soccer 2015, and the gap is execution.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Stick precision and constant prediction of a human opponent's tactical habits.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Pro Evolution Soccer 2015 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on execution.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
Pro Evolution Soccer 2015
First touch, through-ball timing and finishing demand precise sticks
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
Pro Evolution Soccer 2015
Human opponents bait, switch tactics and punish habits
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
Pro Evolution Soccer 2015
Deflections and referee calls add bounded chaos
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
Pro Evolution Soccer 2015
Formations, player roles and set pieces reward study
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.