head to head
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive asks more than Star Wars: Battlefront II, and the gap is execution.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Large-battle aim and positioning with light prediction against human players.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Star Wars: Battlefront II leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on execution.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
Star Wars: Battlefront II
Aimbot dominates infantry fights and starfighter dogfights
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on reads.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
Star Wars: Battlefront II
Human opponents in multiplayer create modest prediction play
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
Star Wars: Battlefront II
Spawns, vehicle availability and hero pickups add chaos
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
Star Wars: Battlefront II
Class choice and map control reward learned plans
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.