head to head
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive asks more than Worms W.M.D, and the gap is execution.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.

Reads · Competitive PvP
Modern Worms with crafting and vehicles, keeping the classic turn-based destructible-terrain warfare.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Worms W.M.D leans Reads (Competitive PvP).
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on execution.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
Worms W.M.D
Shot arcs, rope swings and vehicle control demand precision
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
Worms W.M.D
Multiplayer turns hinge on out-guessing rival worm placement
Worms W.M.D leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
Worms W.M.D
Wind, crates and random terrain reshape options
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
Worms W.M.D
Crafting and weapon budgeting reward planned turns
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.