head to head
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive asks more than WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011, and the gap is execution.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Definitive competitive tactical FPS balancing aim mastery with team strategy.

Execution · Competitive PvP
Reversal-timing duels where humans bait each other inside scripted spectacle.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans Execution (Competitive PvP); WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on execution.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Spray control and flick precision at the top
WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011
Reversal timing windows reward practiced reactions
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans clearly harder on reads.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Anti-stratting and mid-round adaptation
WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011
Versus humans, reversal baiting becomes a guessing duel
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Information hidden until contact
WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011
Momentum swings and AI quirks add mild chaos
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Utility lineups, economy, and default strats
WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2011
Move sets, match types and creation systems are learnable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.