head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
A crafting-heavy survival shooter where weapon-build optimisation and aimed dismemberment carry the loop.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Threading precise inputs through scripted guard gauntlets aboard a controlled and memorisable facility.
Dead Space 3 leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Dead Space 3 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Dead Space 3
Weapon crafting alters execution demands but shooting stays central
Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty
First-person aim and guard reaction windows demand precise input
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dead Space 3
All enemies scripted; co-op adds coordination not prediction
Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty
Guards radio for backup on scripted triggers, not adaptive tactics
Dead Space 3 leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Dead Space 3
Scavenger bot loot adds mild RNG to crafting resources
Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty
Alert timers and item pickups create some hidden-state tension
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dead Space 3
Deep weapon crafting system rewards systematic optimisation
Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty
Chokepoint memorisation and radar manipulation are learnable and repeatable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.