head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is variance, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Cargo-hauling odyssey where route planning and loadout matter most.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A VATS-heavy wasteland RPG won by perk and build optimization.
Death Stranding leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Fallout 3 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Death Stranding
Balance and traversal inputs, modest demands.
Fallout 3
VATS-leaning combat, low aim demand
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Death Stranding
BTs and MULEs scripted, predictable.
Fallout 3
Scripted enemies
Death Stranding leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
Death Stranding
Terrain, weather, BT spawns randomized.
Fallout 3
Loot rolls, SPECIAL checks
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Death Stranding
Cargo loadouts, routes, structures highly solvable.
Fallout 3
Perk and build planning carries the run
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.