head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is optimization, and it is a single point.

Execution · Practiced Mastery
Helicopter handling under fire while routing fuel and ammo across fixed missions.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
Chaotic co-op kitchen game solved by ruthless division of labor.
Desert Strike: Return to the Gulf leans Execution (Practiced Mastery); Overcooked leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery).
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Desert Strike: Return to the Gulf
Helicopter inertia and dodging fire demand real stick control
Overcooked
Chopping, carrying, and plating under the clock
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Desert Strike: Return to the Gulf
Defenses are fixed emplacements, nothing adapts
Overcooked
Kitchens don't adapt; teammates aren't opponents
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Desert Strike: Return to the Gulf
Maps are unknown on first sortie only
Overcooked
Order queue randomness within known sets
Overcooked leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
Desert Strike: Return to the Gulf
Fuel, ammo and mission-order routing is the strategic core
Overcooked
Station assignment and task routing win stars
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.