head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
A turn-based RPG where system mastery and build optimization decide every fight.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
Beloved fantasy turn-based strategy of heroes, castles, and stacked creature armies racing for map control.
Divinity: Original Sin - Enhanced Edition leans Optimization (Pure Optimization); Heroes of Might and Magic II leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Divinity: Original Sin - Enhanced Edition leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Divinity: Original Sin - Enhanced Edition
no real-time physical skill, turn-based
Heroes of Might and Magic II
Turn-based clicking only
Heroes of Might and Magic II leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Divinity: Original Sin - Enhanced Edition
co-op has light unpredictability, mostly solo
Heroes of Might and Magic II
Hotseat duels reward mind games; AI is mappable
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Divinity: Original Sin - Enhanced Edition
dice rolls and loot are randomized
Heroes of Might and Magic II
Map exploration, morale, luck, and combat rolls
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Divinity: Original Sin - Enhanced Edition
builds, combos, and tactics near-solvable
Heroes of Might and Magic II
Build orders, hero chaining, and creature math are deeply solvable
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.
full breakdown
Divinity: Original Sin - Enhanced Edition →
full breakdown
Heroes of Might and Magic II →