Building comparison
head to head
DOOM (2016)vsNintendo World Cup
Neither is simply harder - they are hard in different places. DOOM (2016) demands more execution; Nintendo World Cup demands more reads.
DOOM (2016)
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Push-forward arena FPS where movement and aim are the whole game.
Nintendo World Cup
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Arcade soccer testing reflex tackles and super-shot timing.
DOOM (2016) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Nintendo World Cup leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
DOOM (2016)Nintendo World Cup
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 6
DOOM (2016) leans clearly harder on execution.
DOOM (2016)
Aim, movement, glory-kill timing all peak.
Nintendo World Cup
Tackles and super-shot timing decide most goals
Reads1 vs 3
Nintendo World Cup leans clearly harder on reads.
DOOM (2016)
Demons scripted attack patterns.
Nintendo World Cup
Versus a human, shot fakes add light prediction
Variance1 vs 2
Nintendo World Cup leans a little harder on variance, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Minimal encounter randomness.
Nintendo World Cup
Ball physics add minor chaos
Optimization5 vs 3
DOOM (2016) leans clearly harder on optimization.
DOOM (2016)
Rune and weapon mod picks meaningful.
Nintendo World Cup
Learning super-move triggers is a small solvable layer
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.