Building comparison
head to head
DOOM (2016)vsRaid over Moscow
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
DOOM (2016)
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Push-forward arena FPS where movement and aim are the whole game.
Raid over Moscow
Execution · Pure Mechanics
A multi-stage 8-bit action gauntlet testing joystick precision over memorised sequences.
DOOM (2016) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); Raid over Moscow leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
DOOM (2016)Raid over Moscow
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 7
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Aim, movement, glory-kill timing all peak.
Raid over Moscow
Joystick precision across flying, shooting and dodging sequences
Reads1 vs 0
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Demons scripted attack patterns.
Raid over Moscow
Defences follow fixed attack scripts
Variance1 vs 1
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
DOOM (2016)
Minimal encounter randomness.
Raid over Moscow
Minor timing randomness in enemy fire
Optimization5 vs 4
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on optimization, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Rune and weapon mod picks meaningful.
Raid over Moscow
Each stage has a learnable optimal approach
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.