Building comparison
head to head
DOOM (2016)vsS.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is reads, and it is a single point.
DOOM (2016)
Execution · Pure Mechanics
Push-forward arena FPS where movement and aim are the whole game.
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Execution · Pure Mechanics
A punishing NES run-and-gun testing dodge execution over memorised enemy waves.
DOOM (2016) leans Execution (Pure Mechanics); S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team leans Execution (Pure Mechanics).
DOOM (2016)S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Axis by axis
Execution8 vs 8
Same score on execution - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
DOOM (2016)
Aim, movement, glory-kill timing all peak.
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Dodging dense fire while managing floating aim is everything
Reads1 vs 0
DOOM (2016) leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
DOOM (2016)
Demons scripted attack patterns.
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Alien waves are identical every playthrough
Variance1 vs 1
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
DOOM (2016)
Minimal encounter randomness.
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Fixed spawns - nothing hidden after one run
Optimization5 vs 5
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
DOOM (2016)
Rune and weapon mod picks meaningful.
S.C.A.T.: Special Cybernetic Attack Team
Memorising stage layouts and satellite positioning enables clears
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.