head to head
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.

Optimization · Practiced Mastery
The systems-heavy sequel where the journey itself is the danger.

Optimization · Pure Optimization
An open-world shooter-RPG won by perk routing and weapon mod optimization.
Dragon's Dogma 2 leans Optimization (Practiced Mastery); Fallout 4 leans Optimization (Pure Optimization).
Dragon's Dogma 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
Dragon's Dogma 2
Physical combat and monster climbing demand handling
Fallout 4
FPS aiming, VATS softens demand
Fallout 4 leans a little harder on reads, though the gap is small.
Dragon's Dogma 2
Scripted monster ecology, no adaptation
Fallout 4
Scripted enemy AI
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dragon's Dogma 2
Emergent travel encounters surprise until learned
Fallout 4
Loot and legendary rolls
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
Dragon's Dogma 2
Vocation builds and pawn logistics reward mastery
Fallout 4
Perks, settlement, weapon mod planning
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.