Building comparison
head to head
EA Sports FC 26vsWorms 2
Neither is meaningfully harder - they pose close to the same test. The widest gap is execution, and it is a single point.
EA Sports FC 26
Execution · Competitive PvP
Stick-skill football where outguessing human opponents matters as much as mechanics.
Worms 2
Execution · Competitive PvP
Turn-based artillery comedy where teams of worms annihilate each other.
EA Sports FC 26 leans Execution (Competitive PvP); Worms 2 leans Execution (Competitive PvP).
EA Sports FC 26Worms 2
Axis by axis
Execution6 vs 7
Worms 2 leans a little harder on execution, though the gap is small.
EA Sports FC 26
Dribbling, skill moves and finishing need precise stick work
Worms 2
Ninja rope mastery and pixel-perfect grenade arcs win games.
Reads6 vs 6
Same score on reads - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
EA Sports FC 26
Online matches hinge on baiting and predicting human defenders
Worms 2
Human opponents bait positions and hide intentions.
Variance4 vs 4
Same score on variance - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
EA Sports FC 26
Deflections, ref calls and Ultimate Team packs add randomness
Worms 2
Wind, crate drops and terrain randomness swing turns.
Optimization5 vs 5
Same score on optimization - which means the number cannot separate them. The difference is in what each one asks of you.
EA Sports FC 26
Squad building, tactics and meta mechanics reward study
Worms 2
Weapon economy and positioning theory are studyable.
A matching score does not mean a matching test. Two games can both sit at 10 on execution and demand completely different things of you - which is why the reasoning above matters more than the number beside it.